Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#discussion_r62614867
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
    @@ -155,7 +155,13 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
        */
       def collectAccumulatorUpdates(taskFailed: Boolean = false): 
Seq[AccumulatorV2[_, _]] = {
         if (context != null) {
    -      context.taskMetrics.accumulators().filter { a => !taskFailed || 
a.countFailedValues }
    +      context.taskMetrics.internalAccums.filter { a =>
    +        // RESULT_SIZE accumulator is always zero at executor, we need to 
send it back as its
    +        // value will be updated at driver side.
    +        !a.isZero || a.name == Some(InternalAccumulator.RESULT_SIZE)
    +      // zero value external accumulators may still be useful, e.g. 
SQLMetrics, we should not filter
    --- End diff --
    
    We could see zero value as `null`, it's reasonable to not include the 
`null` in sum/avg. Is there any downside to exclude these zeros ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to