Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13646#discussion_r67037654
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala 
---
    @@ -378,31 +378,9 @@ class DAGScheduler(
        * the provided firstJobId.
        */
       private def getParentStages(rdd: RDD[_], firstJobId: Int): List[Stage] = 
{
    -    val parents = new HashSet[Stage]
    -    val visited = new HashSet[RDD[_]]
    -    // We are manually maintaining a stack here to prevent 
StackOverflowError
    -    // caused by recursively visiting
    -    val waitingForVisit = new Stack[RDD[_]]
    -    def visit(r: RDD[_]) {
    -      if (!visited(r)) {
    -        visited += r
    -        // Kind of ugly: need to register RDDs with the cache here since
    -        // we can't do it in its constructor because # of partitions is 
unknown
    --- End diff --
    
    Yeah I decided that it was probably an accident that it's here -- as you 
said, I think it only belongs in newOrUsedShuffleStage.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to