Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090#discussion_r70202321
  
    --- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
    @@ -306,6 +306,64 @@ head(ldf, 3)
     {% endhighlight %}
     </div>
     
    +#### Run a given function on a large dataset grouping by input column(s) 
and using `gapply` or `gapplyCollect`
    +
    +##### gapply
    +Apply a function to each group of a `SparkDataFrame`. The function is to 
be applied to each group of the `SparkDataFrame` and should have only two 
parameters: grouping key and R `data.frame` corresponding to
    +that key. The groups are chosen from `SparkDataFrame`s column(s).
    +The output of function should be a `data.frame`. Schema specifies the row 
format of the resulting
    +`SparkDataFrame`. It must match the R function's output.
    --- End diff --
    
    Thanks @shivaram.
    Does the following mapping looks fine to have in the table ?
    ```
    **R               Spark**
    byte              byte
    integer          integer
    float              float
    double          double
    numeric        double
    character      string
    string            string
    binary           binary
    raw               binary
    logical           boolean
    timestamp    timestamp
    date              date
    array             array
    map              map
    struct            struct
    ```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to