Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r72184495
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
 ---
    @@ -92,6 +92,36 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends PredicateHelper {
               .map(Alias(_, a.name)(a.exprId, a.qualifier, isGenerated = 
a.isGenerated)).getOrElse(a)
         }
       }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Drop the non-partition key expression from the given expression, to 
optimize the
    +   * partition pruning. For instances: (We assume part1 & part2 are the 
partition keys):
    +   * (part1 == 1 and a > 3) or (part2 == 2 and a < 5)  ==> (part1 == 1 or 
part1 == 2)
    +   * (part1 == 1 and a > 3) or (a < 100) => None
    +   * (a > 100 && b < 100) or (part1 = 10) => None
    +   * (a > 100 && b < 100 and part1 = 10) or (part1 == 2) => (part1 = 10 or 
part1 == 2)
    +   * @param predicate The given expression
    +   * @param partitionKeyIds partition keys in attribute set
    +   * @return
    +   */
    +  def extractPartitionKeyExpression(
    +    predicate: Expression, partitionKeyIds: AttributeSet): 
Option[Expression] = {
    +    // drop the non-partition key expression in conjunction of the 
expression tree
    +    val additionalPartPredicate = predicate transformUp {
    --- End diff --
    
    I can keep updating the code if we are agreed for approach, otherwise, I 
think we'd better close this PR for now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to