Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r73627677
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
 ---
    @@ -25,30 +25,36 @@
     import org.apache.spark.sql.types.*;
     import org.apache.spark.unsafe.Platform;
     import org.apache.spark.unsafe.array.ByteArrayMethods;
    +import org.apache.spark.unsafe.bitset.BitSetMethods;
     import org.apache.spark.unsafe.hash.Murmur3_x86_32;
     import org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.CalendarInterval;
     import org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String;
     
     /**
      * An Unsafe implementation of Array which is backed by raw memory instead 
of Java objects.
      *
    - * Each tuple has three parts: [numElements] [offsets] [values]
    + * Each tuple has four parts: [numElements][null bits][values or 
offset][variable length portion]
    --- End diff --
    
    The previous format isn't aligned either, I think it's ok because 
`UnsafeArray` won't appear along, but always as a field of `UnsafeRow`. And we 
do align the whole content of `UnsafeArray` when write it into `UnsafeRow`


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to