Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
I found the ```summary``` of ```spark.logit``` return incorrect result when
reviewing this PR. Actually it should return ```coefficients``` rather than
binary logistic regression summary that R users may not be interested.
Meanwhile, the binary logistic regression summary will ignore ```weightCol```
and treats all instance weights as ```1.0```, we are discussing to resolve this
issue at Scala side. I will send a PR to correct ```summary``` return value for
```spark.logit``` and hope it can catch 2.1. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
