Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968586
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java
 ---
    @@ -107,7 +107,16 @@ public void initialize(InputSplit inputSplit, 
TaskAttemptContext taskAttemptCont
           footer = readFooter(configuration, file, range(split.getStart(), 
split.getEnd()));
           MessageType fileSchema = footer.getFileMetaData().getSchema();
           FilterCompat.Filter filter = getFilter(configuration);
    -      blocks = filterRowGroups(filter, footer.getBlocks(), fileSchema);
    +      try {
    +        blocks = filterRowGroups(filter, footer.getBlocks(), fileSchema);
    +      } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
    +        // In the case where a particular parquet files does not contain
    +        // the column(s) in the filter, we don't do filtering at this level
    +        // PARQUET-389 will resolve this issue in Parquet 1.9, which may 
be used
    +        // by future Spark versions. This is a workaround for current 
Spark version.
    +        // Also the assumption here is that the predicates will be applied 
later
    +        blocks = footer.getBlocks();
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes. Will do. Thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to