Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2262#discussion_r17096919
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
    @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ case class Limit(limit: Int, child: SparkPlan)
       // partition local limit -> exchange into one partition -> partition 
local limit again
     
       override def output = child.output
    +  override def outputPartitioning = SinglePartition
    --- End diff --
    
    This is not changing the implementation, just correcting a bug that
    prevents exchange operators from being inserted when we need them.
    On Sep 3, 2014 11:00 PM, "Cheng Hao" <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
    
    > In
    > 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala:
    >
    > > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ case class Limit(limit: Int, child: SparkPlan)
    > >    // partition local limit -> exchange into one partition -> partition 
local limit again
    > >
    > >    override def output = child.output
    > > +  override def outputPartitioning = SinglePartition
    >
    > SinglePartition for LIMIT may cause performance issue for large number of
    > records(in multiple partitions), do we really need to change this?
    >
    > —
    > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
    > <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2262/files#r17096863>.
    >


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to