Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16157
Sorry for the delay. You are probably right that the partitioning is
primarily determined by data locality and that it is therefore appropriate in
some cases and shouldn't be worded such as to imply it isn't usually
appropriate. I will think about how to word it more appropriately and remove
the implementation specifics.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
