Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16639#discussion_r96909723
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/FetchFailedException.scala ---
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ private[spark] class FetchFailedException(
this(bmAddress, shuffleId, mapId, reduceId, cause.getMessage, cause)
}
+ // SPARK-19267. We set the fetch failure in the task context, so that
even if there is user-code
+ // which intercepts this exception (possibly wrapping it), the Executor
can still tell there was
+ // a fetch failure, and send the correct error msg back to the driver.
The TaskContext won't be
+ // defined if this is run on the driver (just in test cases) -- we can
safely ignore then.
+ Option(TaskContext.get()).map(_.setFetchFailed(this))
--- End diff --
yes, good point. I added to the docs, does it look OK?
I also considered making the call to `TaskContext.setFetchFailed` live
outside of the constructor, so at each site it was created, it would have to be
called -- but I thought that seemed more dangerous.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
