Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r100461137
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
    @@ -695,11 +690,16 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int 
klen, Object vbase, long voff
           assert (vlen % 8 == 0);
           assert (longArray != null);
     
    -      if (numKeys == MAX_CAPACITY
    -        // The map could be reused from last spill (because of no enough 
memory to grow),
    -        // then we don't try to grow again if hit the `growthThreshold`.
    -        || !canGrowArray && numKeys > growthThreshold) {
    -        return false;
    +      if (numKeys >= growthThreshold) {
    +        if (longArray.size() / 2 == MAX_CAPACITY) {
    --- End diff --
    
    Is `MAX_CAPACITY` still the maximum number of keys as per documentation of 
it? If we can have `longArray.size() / 2 == MAX_CAPACITY` at most for the 
capacity, the actually `numKeys` should be `MAX_CAPACITY / 2`, because we need 
two long array entries per key, right?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to