Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415 @jkbradley Sent an update to refine the transform code and address the comments. Regarding to the behavior changing concern, I think different partition strategy will only affect the overall efficiency and maybe the order of the frequent itemsets and association rules. As long as the result set does not change, I don't think it will disturb the users. Let me know if I miss anything.
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org