Github user samelamin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487#discussion_r109286453
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveTableValuedFunctions.scala
---
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ object ResolveTableValuedFunctions extends
Rule[LogicalPlan] {
override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan
resolveOperators {
case u: UnresolvedTableValuedFunction if
u.functionArgs.forall(_.resolved) =>
- builtinFunctions.get(u.functionName) match {
+ builtinFunctions.get(u.functionName.toLowerCase) match {
--- End diff --
@hvanhovell instead of creating a new case class, is there a way I can
reuse the UnresolvedTableValuedFunction case class and just add in the SQLConf
class?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
