Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r111914872
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationHistoryProvider.scala
 ---
    @@ -99,6 +104,19 @@ private[history] abstract class 
ApplicationHistoryProvider {
       }
     
       /**
    +   * Bind to the History Server: threads should be started here; 
exceptions may be raised
    +   * Start the provider: threads should be started here; exceptions may be 
raised
    +   * if the history provider cannot be started.
    +   * The base implementation contains a re-entrancy check and should
    --- End diff --
    
    All the work on Yarn service model, and that of SmartFrog before it, have 
given me a fear of startup logic. I'll see about doing it there though


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to