Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031
  
    To resolve the comments in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989 :
    >minimum size before we consider something a large block : if average is 
10kb, and some blocks are > 20kb, spilling them to disk would be highly 
suboptimal.
    
    >One edge-case to consider is the situation where every shuffle block is 
just over this threshold: in this case HighlyCompressedMapStatus won't really 
be doing any compression.
    
    I propose two configs: 
    `spark.shuffle.accurateBlockThreshold` and 
`spark.shuffle.accurateBlockThresholdByTimesAverage` , sizes of blocks above 
both will be record accurately.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to