Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18106#discussion_r123884830
  
    --- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
    @@ -1382,8 +1382,8 @@ test_that("column functions", {
       c20 <- to_timestamp(c) + to_timestamp(c, "yyyy") + to_date(c, "yyyy")
       c21 <- posexplode_outer(c) + explode_outer(c)
       c22 <- not(c)
    -  c23 <- trunc(c, "year") + trunc(c, "yyyy") + trunc(c, "yy") +
    -    trunc(c, "month") + trunc(c, "mon") + trunc(c, "mm")
    +  c23 <- trunc(to_date(c), "year") + trunc(to_date(c), "yyyy") + 
trunc(to_date(c), "yy") +
    +    trunc(to_date(c), "month") + trunc(to_date(c), "mon") + 
trunc(to_date(c), "mm")
    --- End diff --
    
    that's a good point. fortunately (?) trunc was only added to R in 2.3.0, so 
I think we need to make sure (manually, add unit test) that trunc works on date 
columns and numeric columns


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to