Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18419#discussion_r124331858
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLExecution.scala ---
    @@ -100,7 +105,9 @@ object SQLExecution {
           // all accumulator metrics will be 0. It will confuse people if we 
show them in Web UI.
           //
           // A real case is the `DataFrame.count` method.
    -      throw new IllegalArgumentException(s"$EXECUTION_ID_KEY is already 
set")
    +      throw new IllegalArgumentException(s"$EXECUTION_ID_KEY is already 
set, please wrap your " +
    --- End diff --
    
    The problem is that this is an easy error to hit and it shouldn't affect 
end users. It is better to warn that something is wrong than to fail a job that 
would otherwise succeed for a bug in Spark. As for the error message, I think 
it is fine if we intend to leave it in. I'd just rather not fail user jobs here.
    
    I assume that DataSource developers will have tests, but probably not ones 
that know to set spark.testing. Is there a better way to detect test cases?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to