Github user bdrillard commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518#discussion_r145213781
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
 ---
    @@ -801,7 +908,10 @@ class CodegenContext {
             addNewFunction(name, code)
           }
     
    -      foldFunctions(functions.map(name => 
s"$name(${arguments.map(_._2).mkString(", ")})"))
    +      val exprs = transformFunctions(functions.map(name =>
    +        s"$name(${arguments.map(_._2).mkString(", ")})"))
    +
    +      splitExpressions(exprs, funcName, arguments)
    --- End diff --
    
    Changes I made here to `splitExpressions` were to handle instances where 
the split code method references were still over 64kb. It would seem this 
problem is addressed by @mgaido91 in #19480, and that implementation is much 
more thorough, so if that PR gets merged, I'd prefer to rebase against that.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to