Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20851#discussion_r176922300 --- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala --- @@ -353,6 +353,13 @@ object SQLConf { .booleanConf .createWithDefault(true) + val PARQUET_FILTER_PUSHDOWN_DATE_ENABLED = buildConf("spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.date") + .doc("If true, enables Parquet filter push-down optimization for Date. " + + "This configuration only has an effect when 'spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown' is enabled.") + .internal() + .booleanConf + .createWithDefault(false) --- End diff -- If you think so, +1. :) BTW, based on Apache Spark way, I assume that this will not land on `branch-2.3` with `spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.date=true`.
--- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org