Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20997
@koeninger
> I don't see an upper bound on the number of consumers per key, nor a way
of reaping idle consumers. If the SQL equivalent code is likely to be modified
to use pooling of some kind, seems better to make a consistent decision.
When do you think the decision will happen?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
