Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21143
@cloud-fan, that's kind of the point I was trying to make. It is too
difficult to do whole-stage codegen, but we could add a codegen filter before
whole-stage codegen. Why make the implementation handle it using Spark
internals when we could do it more cleanly in Spark?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
