Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21390
  
    Context for other reviewers: the issue addressed by this patch is actually 
a real issue in practice, especially for long-lived Spark clusters; I have seen 
this specific problem play a large contributing role to certain production 
out-of-disk-space failures.
    
    One thing I'd like to note: as implemented here, this patch only addresses 
this problem for Spark's built-in "Standalone" cluster manager. @jiangxb1987, 
could you mention that limitation in the PR title and description? My personal 
preference is to proceed incrementally by merging this Standalone-only PR and 
and deferring support for other cluster managers to future PRs (perhaps from 
experts familiar with those other cluster managers).
    
    I'll take a more detailed look tomorrow, but just wanted to provide 
motivation for other reviewers who might leave comments before then.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to