Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r193737191
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/InMemoryUnsafeRowQueue.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.sql.execution
    +
    +import java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
    +
    +import scala.collection.mutable
    +import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.{SparkEnv, TaskContext}
    +import org.apache.spark.memory.TaskMemoryManager
    +import org.apache.spark.serializer.SerializerManager
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRow
    +import 
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.DefaultInitialSizeOfInMemoryBuffer
    +import org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager
    +
    +/**
    + * An append-only array for [[UnsafeRow]]s that strictly keeps content in 
an in-memory array
    + * until [[numRowsInMemoryBufferThreshold]] is reached post which it will 
switch to a mode which
    + * would flush to disk after [[numRowsSpillThreshold]] is met (or before 
if there is
    + * excessive memory consumption). Setting these threshold involves 
following trade-offs:
    + *
    + * - If [[numRowsInMemoryBufferThreshold]] is too high, the in-memory 
array may occupy more memory
    + *   than is available, resulting in OOM.
    + * - If [[numRowsSpillThreshold]] is too low, data will be spilled 
frequently and lead to
    + *   excessive disk writes. This may lead to a performance regression 
compared to the normal case
    + *   of using an [[ArrayBuffer]] or [[Array]].
    + */
    +private[sql] class InMemoryUnsafeRowQueue(
    --- End diff --
    
    No way to avoid making a custom queue implementation here? is it messier 
without such a structure?


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to