Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19687879
  
    --- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
    @@ -449,12 +445,11 @@ def intersection(self, other):
     
         def _reserialize(self, serializer=None):
             serializer = serializer or self.ctx.serializer
    -        if self._jrdd_deserializer == serializer:
    -            return self
    -        else:
    -            converted = self.map(lambda x: x, preservesPartitioning=True)
    -            converted._jrdd_deserializer = serializer
    -            return converted
    +        if self._jrdd_deserializer != serializer:
    +            if not isinstance(self, PipelinedRDD):
    +                self = self.map(lambda x: x, preservesPartitioning=True)
    --- End diff --
    
    Is it safe to re-assign to `self` here?  This seems to change the semantics 
of this `_reserialize()` method, since it now mutates the original RDD's 
serializer rather than returning a new one.  This might break / impact programs 
that aren't expecting an RDD object's serializer to change once that RDD is 
exposed to users (the reassignment to `converted._jrdd_deserializer` is safe 
because we haven't exposed `converted` to user code yet).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to