Github user maryannxue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
I think the behavior definition is good and clear. But just a question on
the implementation: is it necessary to introduce a new class `InValues`? or we
could simply make `In` has it's first child "value" as `Seq[Expression]` type?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
