Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21927#discussion_r206985923 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala --- @@ -340,6 +340,22 @@ class DAGScheduler( } } + /** + * Check to make sure we don't launch a barrier stage with unsupported RDD chain pattern. The + * following patterns are not supported: + * 1. Ancestor RDDs that have different number of partitions from the resulting RDD (eg. + * union()/coalesce()/first()/PartitionPruningRDD); --- End diff -- but coalesce should be OK, right? Is it just too fragile to allow coalesce while excluding the others?
--- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org