Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009#discussion_r208684225
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/streaming/ContinuousPartitionReaderFactory.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.reader.streaming;
    +
    +import java.io.Serializable;
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.annotation.InterfaceStability;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.InternalRow;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.reader.InputPartition;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.vectorized.ColumnarBatch;
    +
    +/**
    + * A factory used to create {@link ContinuousPartitionReader} instances.
    + */
    +@InterfaceStability.Evolving
    +public interface ContinuousPartitionReaderFactory extends Serializable {
    --- End diff --
    
    @rdblue I have to fork a `PartitionReaderFactory` for continuous streaming, 
in order to use the name `createContinuousReader`. Also I need to rename 
`ContinuousReaderSupport.createReaderFactory ` to 
`createContinuousReaderFactory`, which requires to move out 
`createReaderFactory` from the base interace `ReadSupport`.
    
    Is it really worth? The existing sources only implement 
`XYZReadSupportProvider` at the same time, but not `XYZReadSupport`. e.g. 
micro-batch and continuous read support are always 2 different classes, as the 
logic is so different. I believe file source will be the same.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to