Github user kiszk commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
  
    Thank for involving me in an important thread. I was busy this morning in 
Japan.
    
    I think there are three topics in the thread.
    1. Merge or revert this PR
    2. Design document
    3. IR design
    
    For 1., in short, my opinion is likely to revert this PR from the view like 
a release manager.
    
    As we know, it is a time to cut a release branch. This PR partially 
introduce a new representation. If there would be a bug in code generation at 
Spark 2.4, it may introduce a complication of debugging and fixing.
    As @mgaido91 pointed out, #20043 and #21026 have been merged. I think that 
they are a kind of refactoring (e.g. change the representation of literal, 
class, and so on). Thus, these two PRs can be there. However, this PR 
introduces a mixture of representation `s""` and `code""`.
    
    WDYT?


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to