Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22165#discussion_r224955955 --- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ContextBarrierStateSuite.scala --- @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.spark.scheduler + +import scala.concurrent.duration._ +import scala.language.postfixOps + +import org.mockito.ArgumentMatcher +import org.mockito.Matchers._ +import org.mockito.Mockito._ +import org.scalatest.concurrent.Eventually + +import org.apache.spark._ +import org.apache.spark.rpc.{RpcAddress, RpcCallContext, RpcEnv} + +class ContextBarrierStateSuite extends SparkFunSuite with LocalSparkContext with Eventually { + + private def mockRpcCallContext() = { + val rpcAddress = mock(classOf[RpcAddress]) + val rpcCallContext = mock(classOf[RpcCallContext]) + when(rpcCallContext.senderAddress).thenReturn(rpcAddress) + rpcCallContext + } + + test("normal test for single task") { + val barrierCoordinator = new BarrierCoordinator( --- End diff -- ``` So you don't have to launch a SparkContext for the test. Could you please check whether this is feasible? ``` Thanks for Xingbo's guidance and sorry for misunderstand at first. That's feasible. But maybe this is the last thing not clear cause we still need a real BarrierCoordinator. Because a mock one will cause the `timer` NPE. Thanks @jiangxb1987 https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/2eaf0587883ac3c65e77d01ffbb39f64c6152f87/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierCoordinator.scala#L152
--- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org