maropu commented on a change in pull request #20965: [SPARK-21870][SQL] Split 
aggregation code into small functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20965#discussion_r316932766
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
 ##########
 @@ -267,29 +302,81 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
           
e.aggregateFunction.asInstanceOf[DeclarativeAggregate].mergeExpressions
       }
     }
-    ctx.currentVars = bufVars ++ input
-    val boundUpdateExpr = bindReferences(updateExpr, inputAttrs)
-    val subExprs = 
ctx.subexpressionEliminationForWholeStageCodegen(boundUpdateExpr)
-    val effectiveCodes = subExprs.codes.mkString("\n")
-    val aggVals = ctx.withSubExprEliminationExprs(subExprs.states) {
-      boundUpdateExpr.map(_.genCode(ctx))
-    }
-    // aggregate buffer should be updated atomic
-    val updates = aggVals.zipWithIndex.map { case (ev, i) =>
+
+    if (!conf.codegenSplitAggregateFunc) {
+      ctx.currentVars = bufVars ++ input
+      val boundUpdateExpr = updateExpr.map(BindReferences.bindReference(_, 
inputAttrs))
+      val subExprs = 
ctx.subexpressionEliminationForWholeStageCodegen(boundUpdateExpr)
+      val effectiveCodes = subExprs.codes.mkString("\n")
+      val aggVals = ctx.withSubExprEliminationExprs(subExprs.states) {
+        boundUpdateExpr.map(_.genCode(ctx))
+      }
+      // aggregate buffer should be updated atomic
+      val updates = aggVals.zipWithIndex.map { case (ev, i) =>
+        s"""
+           | ${bufVars(i).isNull} = ${ev.isNull};
+           | ${bufVars(i).value} = ${ev.value};
+       """.stripMargin
+      }
+      s"""
+         | // do aggregate
+         | // common sub-expressions
+         | $effectiveCodes
+         | // evaluate aggregate function
+         | ${evaluateVariables(aggVals)}
+         | // update aggregation buffer
+         | ${updates.mkString("\n").trim}
+     """.stripMargin
+    } else {
+      // We need to copy the aggregation buffer to local variables first 
because each aggregate
 
 Review comment:
   Ur, I see. I never thought about that until now. plz give me some time. 
Based on the suggestion, I'll look for another solution.
   
   btw, I'll update the description, too.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to