Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23942054
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
    @@ -47,9 +49,13 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager: 
BlockManager) extends Logging {
             val inputMetrics = blockResult.inputMetrics
             val existingMetrics = context.taskMetrics
               .getInputMetricsForReadMethod(inputMetrics.readMethod)
    -        existingMetrics.addBytesRead(inputMetrics.bytesRead)
    +        existingMetrics.incBytesRead(inputMetrics.bytesRead)
     
    -        new InterruptibleIterator(context, 
blockResult.data.asInstanceOf[Iterator[T]])
    +        val iter = blockResult.data.asInstanceOf[Iterator[T]]
    +        new InterruptibleIterator(context, 
AfterNextInterceptingIterator(iter, (next: T) => {
    +          existingMetrics.incRecordsRead(1)
    --- End diff --
    
    @ksakellis I think Patrick means locking in the sense that `AtomicLong` and 
its ilk use special compare-and-swap hardware instructions that lock the bus.  
They're more performant than acquiring a software lock, but still have high 
overhead compared to updating a variable that's in CPU cache.
    
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compare-and-swap


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to