I suggest separating things:

1) We have long allowed citation of I-Ds for informational purposes.  I don't think anyone wants to prohibit that.

2) Whatever we say in our boilerplate, we can't stop other folks from citing I-Ds in the equivalent of normative fashions.  So be it.

3) It would be really strange to cite an I-D as a normative reference in an IETF RFC.  Did you mean to cite that particular version normatively?  Or are you so confident that the I-D will not change before it becomes an RFC that you insist on citing it now?  And not merely waiting to publish the RFC till the cited document is actually done?

4) Related to 3, citing an I-D for an IANA registry that requires a stable specification seems very odd.  Do we intend the code point to mean any version of the document (even though they probably differ?  Do we intend the code point to mean the behavior in this version of the document, even though the IETF may later decide that the right behavior is something else?  If we claimed to want a stable specification so implementations using the code point interoperate (as distinct from an FCFS registry where the point is just to make sure folks don't collide) then we need to actually be stable.  (If we discover that while we thought we wanted interoperable code points all we really want is non-conflicting code points then fix the rules for the specific registry.)

Yours,

Joel

On 12/10/2024 3:46 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:

And this is where we run into problems, because the moment you change that boiler plate, you will devalue the RFC series and create support and interoperability problems as people end up implementing different versions of a specification.  And to be clear, IANA is the LEAST of our problems.  The IETF needs a way to have not-ready-for-prime-time DRAFT work without fear ofcreating a mess.

Eliot


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to