Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > I don’t know about that. The general population seems unable to tell > the difference among the various RFC streams, as well as drafts and > not.
ha. Very cynical ha.
> But if necessary, one possible fix is this:
} It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material *for
} other than IETF purposes* or to cite them other than as "work in
} progress."
That's good.
I don't know where that gets us: is assignment of values an IETF Purpose?
When the I-D is a personal one? Still I prefer an I-D over
http://geocities.com/rsalz/my-pet-protocol.txt
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
