Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 6:13 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> The question remains, when the RPC edits text, whether XML or kramdown, >> ought they do a do-nothing pass where they change to NSNL. >> Assume that there is a tool to do this. >> If not, ought they at least attempt NSNL for any changes that *they* make. >> {I'd really like that part}
> Good god no. Why would you gratuitously make a change that would affect
> all subsequent diffs?
No to converting it once.
Or no to always doing *their* changes with a NSNL?
Because, the rich-text version of the diff is *zero*, so it's easy to see
that nothing changed.
Then subsequent diffs are sane.
> Someone did this to the mDNSResponder sources
> back in ~2005 and now you can't do git blame on anything prior to
> that. Please, no gratuitous formatting changes to the source code.
Yes, for source code which is never routinely wrapped, this is annoying.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
