On 16.05.2025 17:22, Salz, Rich wrote:
An additional reason why I think that English sentences are better than ABNF or 
any other formalism as the normative part of a standard track RFC:  most people 
understand what an English sentence means,

Can you imagine defining HTTP without ABNF? Or any other text-based protocol 
that the IETF works on?

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9651#appendix-D-2.3.1>

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to