I agree with Eliot that we now have an inconsistency with respect to
Section 7.6, but I don't think the fix is to remove the (as Jay says) very
carefully negotiated "historical" text, especially as part of the idea was
to acknowledge historical perspectives.

Instead, I think the right fix is to revert 7.6 to the original language
from RFC 9280 and add a note that acknowledges that we are relaxing this
property. Perhaps "Note that historically RFCs were treated as immutable,
but [THIS RFC] allows those RFCs to be reissued provided that the semantic
content is preserved to the greatest extent possible".

-Ekr



On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:11 AM Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:

> I do recall, but we are no longer using those properties in the same way-
> they have been modified; and so the text is no longer accurate. Also my
> comments were and are as an individual during the community comment phase.
>
> Eliot
> On 17.06.2025 15:42, Jay Daley wrote:
>
> Eliot
>
>
> On 4 Jun 2025, at 11:38, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Chapeau in Section 7 now looks a little funny, and historically wrong, 
> given that we appear to be changing history.  To this end, I suggest the 
> following changes:
> OLD:
> 7. Historical Properties of the RFC Series
> NEW:
> 7. Properties of the RFC Series
> OLD:
> This section lists some of the properties that have been historically
> regarded as important to the RFC Series.
> NEW:
> This section lists some of the properties that are
> regarded as important to the RFC Series.
>
> You may not recall, but the existing language was a careful compromise 
> reflecting some very different views on the applicability of these 
> properties.  There were a number who strongly disagreed with these properties 
> as things to maintain going forward and so the wording was chosen to reflect 
> that these properties, while once considered important, no longer had 
> consensus.  In that context, changing this in the RSAB stage of processing is 
> quite problematic.
>
> Jay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to