Yes, both the info pages and the errata pages should continur to work as is. In particular, I would consider the info page to be the archival URL for an RFC - ie we should never touch those.
Alexis On Sat, Aug 23, 2025, 12:05 AM Brian E Carpenter < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alexis, > > One question. When the IETF web site was significantly updated some years > ago, we went to a lot of trouble to ensure that existing URLs that were > widely known or embedded in RFCs were preserved (as redirects). Has the > same been done for rfc-editor.org? > > For example, will URLs such as https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1 or > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2541 still work? > > FWIW, it was not a small job for the IETF site... you can see the list of > "sacred" URLs from the old IETF site on pages 6-14 of > https://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/IETF-Website-SOW-20140604-Final.pdf > > Regards/Ngā mihi > Brian Carpenter > > On 23-Aug-25 08:33, Alexis Rossi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The IETF engineering team and the RPC are working on a new version of > rfc-editor.org <http://rfc-editor.org>.. You will be able to get a sneak > peak of it at IETF 124 in Montreal at the RPC desk. In the meantime, we > have released a blog post with some details: > > > > https://www.ietf.org/blog/rfc-editor-website-reimagined/ < > https://www.ietf.org/blog/rfc-editor-website-reimagined/> > > > > Thanks, > > Alexis Rossi > > RFC Series Consulting Editor > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
