Hi Ekr, There are some things not functioning yet, as well as some wonky data, in this case per Robert's email: "This demo does not cover views of the queue or the errata system. Those will be coming in the next several weeks."
Thanks, Alexis On Sat, Nov 1, 2025, 5:56 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert, > > Thanks for putting this together. I took an initial look and I've found > some > issues and wanted to get a sense of how best to engage. In particular, > when I click on the GitHub link to report issues [0] I see that there are > only > three open issues, but there are other things missing that it seems the > team > knows about. For instance this appears on the errata page: > > [image: image.png] > > There are also other things that don't seem to work but are not flagged > with > TODOs (e.g., missing errata on RFCs which have errata). Is there some > project plan or issues list etc. that we can refer to to see what is > supposed to > work and what is known not to? > > -Ekr > > [0] https://github.com/ietf-tools/red-beta/issues > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 1:34 PM Robert Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In addition to the in-person demos at the RFC Editor and Tools Team >> desks this week, a snapshot of the work in progress for the new RFC >> Editor website is available for browsing at >> https://www-beta.rfc-editor.org. >> >> If you have feedback, please send it to [email protected], open an >> issue at https://github.com/ietf-tools/red-beta/issues or come talk to >> us at the desks. >> >> A couple of things to keep in mind while looking through this snapshot: >> >> It is taking data from a development instance of the datatracker, which >> is serving as a temporary stand-in for the data that will come from the >> new RPC database under development. That instance's data is not being >> updated during the week, so any RFCs published during the week will not >> appear there. >> >> The datatracker has slightly different author information than the >> authoritative RPC database, so you will see differences with author >> names. This will be resolved - the datatracker and the RPC database will >> have the same data about authors - before this new website goes into >> production. >> >> This demo does not cover views of the queue or the errata system. Those >> will be coming in the next several weeks. >> >> You will need to be logged to the datatracker to view the demo site. The >> production website will not have this requirement. >> >> The demo will be taken down at the end of IETF 124. Future versions of >> it are likely before we reach the production deployment, which is >> expected before IETF 125. >> >> RjS >> >> On 10/15/25 1:22 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >> > Please come by the RFC Editor and Tools Team desks during IETF 124. We >> > will have a preview of the rfc-editor.org website that is under >> > development available for demonstration. >> > >> > Today's blog post at >> > https://www.ietf.org/blog/rfc-editor-website-update/ has more about >> > the upcoming website. >> > >> > RjS >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > ----------------------------------------------- > Tools-discuss mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
