Jean Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote: > ### GitHub Roadmap (Reflecting Changing Author Processes AP-2, AP-3)
> The RPC is offering an optional AUTH48 process whereby the RPC shares
> its proposed edits with authors using a pull request made against the
> approved source file in an RPC-created GitHub repo. This GitHub-based
> process is currently being offered on limited basis, and the RPC is
> accepting 5 documents per month. For details, see the RPC GitHub
> roadmap at
I want to continue to suggest that this be a *GIT* process, not a *github.com*
one.
While there was a small (but vocal) minority of people who have never wanted
to participate on github, with the continuing lack of v6 and then more recent
shenaghans there, that concern grows.
I continue to suggest that the IETF/LLC/RPC should own/pay for our own system.
Either self-hosted codeberg, gitlab, ... or hiring a hosted system from someone.
I have not had the privilege of doing the git(hub) AUTH48 process yet.
I look forward to it. I suspect that due to the decentralized nature of
*git*, that authors that do not want to interact with this bigtech entity
probably can just do appropriate git-clones, but I haven't seen the emails yet.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
