On Friday 29 February 2008 04:53:33 solarflow99 wrote: > I was surprised by some of those recommendations since redhat linux has > always used the UPG scheme, so users are their own groups anyways.
I'd be curious which recommendations you found surprising. > There was no mention of that or how some of the recommendations including > how custom SSL in each place was supposed to be useful. Again, I'm curious where custom SSL was being recommended. > It just seemed to come across as: of course redhat linux cant be secure, > here's how to try and deal with it. I don't pick up on that tone. Which guide did you get that from? Thanks, -Steve _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
