Ben wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, John Summerfield wrote:
Ben wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, solarflow99 wrote:
It would also be possible to install grub on the other drive
manually if that is good enough, I have the grub commands if you need.
That's helpful, thanks... but I'd still like to know why it's
choosing the MBR of sdb over the one on sda!
I did a manual install to a dc7700. Here is the relevant section from
anaconda-ks.cfg
bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=hda,hdc
--append="pci=nomsi,nommconf vga=794 rhgb quiet"
[...]
Yeah, my bootloader line was of the form
bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=sda
Maybe I should have added ",sdb" to the end?
It's an idea worth trying, I think.
Now, the drive names _might_ be signficant. So might the fact that the
bootloader line lists two drives.
That's perhaps my thinking. But here's a twist:
I set up two RAID1 arrays. Array one contained disks 0 and 1, array two
contained disks 2 and 3. That was also the order in which I created
them. Pre OS-installation the LSI BIOS listed "Array 1 of 2" as the one
containing disks 0 and 1 and "Array 2 of 2" as having the other pair.
"Scan Order" was listed as "0" for the RAID1 array with disks 0 and 1,
and "2" for the second array. I'm assuming these were (SCSI?) ID
numbers (see below).
Now I'm thoroughly lost; I don't know whether you're using SCSI or
serial ATA, and I know nothing about them SUNs, and next to nothing
about SCSI.
I just saw some similarities between what you are doing, and what I
did, and it seemed to me that what I did is close to what you want to do.
Should I go and stick my head in a pig?
What sort of pig do you have in mind:-)
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
