On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Vanco Backup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the comments all. I suspected it was an RFC issue, but it was a > bit late to check the Interwebs. > > Should one not exist, I may open a Bugzilla ticket (and refer to the Fedora > fix) just to see what opinion is on changing it. >
Yes, it would seem that some later RFC's change the syntax of 952 (1101 for example) but the RFC was never actually obsoleted or listed as being altered like other RFC's. Also the 1101 talks about leading characters in Domain Names but does not mention the Hostname so its not clear on my first reading if 3com.3com.com is legal (3com.com is legal of course.) -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
