On 02/09/2010 07:14 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 02/08/10 21:52, [email protected] wrote:
That's odd... Are you using ftp from the command line? I mean, the ftp
from e.g. krb5-workstation?
In this case, the command-line client was a Fedora 12 system. We are
seeing the same behavior from Windows ftp clients, however. Not all the
time, though
It looks like your client is asking for extended passive (EPASV 2) and
then passive (LPASV). I just did this on a RHEL 5.4 client to a RHEL 5.4
vsftpd server and I am not seeing anything near the same log entries.
Have you made any changes to your vsftpd configuration?
# grep -v '^#' vsftpd.conf
anonymous_enable=NO
local_enable=YES
write_enable=YES
local_umask=022
dirmessage_enable=YES
dual_log_enable=YES
log_ftp_protocol=YES
xferlog_enable=YES
connect_from_port_20=YES
xferlog_file=/var/log/xferlog
xferlog_std_format=YES
idle_session_timeout=120
data_connection_timeout=240
ftpd_banner=Welcome to my company FTP service. All Transactions are
Monitored.
chroot_list_enable=YES
chroot_list_file=/etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.chroot_list
pam_service_name=vsftpd
userlist_deny=NO
listen=YES
tcp_wrappers=YES
I used /usr/bin/ftp (ftp-0.17-51.fc12.x86_64) and /usr/bin/lftp
(lftp-4.0.4-1.fc12.x86_64) on F12 to connect to a RHEL 5.4 box with
exactly your config and I am not seeing the EPASV/LPASV entries in my
logs. Do you have any kind of rc files for ftp?
--
Thomas Cameron, RHCA, RHCDS, RHCVA, RHCX, CNE, MCSE, MCT
Solutions Architect Team Lead, Central Region
512-241-0774 office / 512-585-5631 cell / 512-857-1345 fax
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
