Also, the kernel only need be upgraded on the server, not the client.

-C

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Corey Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jens,
>
> That looks like a problem we had as well. You might also see that "dot"
> files are really messed up. The problem exists in that particular kernel
> release I believe (I don't have it in front of me atm) and an upgrade is
> necessary. It's a problem specific to NFS I believe.
>
> -Corey
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Jens Voigt <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> we are running RHEL5.4 2.6.18-164.el5PAE on 2 Servers. One is mounting an
>> FC-Storage(MPIO) and export this via NFS to the Network(NIS, automounter)
>> also via Samba.
>>
>> I created a new file on the samba share on server1 and do a 'ls -altr' on
>> the server1. So the new file is on the bottom. Everythings fine.
>> #ls -altr
>> Aug  8  2008 oldfile
>> Mar  3 11:01 newfile
>>
>> Now my Problem one user reported and also happens on my workstation 2
>> times:
>> Server2 mounts the same folder via nfsv3
>> The same 'ls -altr' on server2 shows me also the same file at the bottom
>> and a second old file in this folder with the same new timestamp.
>> At the same time on server1 'ls -altr' shows me the correct timestamps.
>> The second old file dated in year 2008.
>> A second 'ls -altr' on server2 shows me also the correct timestamps now.
>>
>> Server1
>> #ls -altr
>> Aug  8  2008 oldfile
>> Mar  3 11:01 newfile
>> at the same time on Server2
>> #ls -altr
>> Mar  3 11:01 oldfile
>> Mar  3 11:01 newfile
>>
>> one second later on Server2
>> #ls -altr
>> Aug  8  2008 oldfile
>> Mar  3 11:01 newfile
>>
>> I don't know which component is causing this problem. For my understanding
>> it must be nfs.
>>
>> regards Jens
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rhelv5-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to