48 logical cpus, 64GB of ram, no wait states, and yet calibre64 is using many cores, is this a test program? In the real world, it would be 1 core at 100% and the rest at 0.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Paul Krizak <[email protected]> wrote: > In case you were wondering what it looks like (screenshot attached) > > > Paul Krizak 7171 Southwest Pkwy MS B200.3A > Senior Systems Engineer Austin, TX 78735 > Advanced Micro Devices Desk: (512) 602-8775 > Linux/Unix Systems Engineering Cell: (512) 791-0686 > Global IT Infrastructure Fax: (512) 602-0468 > > On 03/30/10 19:10, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: >> >> As an AMD-er, Paul Krizak sounds rightly proud of the new Opteron 6000 >> "Magny-Cours" 12-core processors supported by the new RHEL5.5. However, >> it occurs to me there are quite a few old-time one-dimensional GNU >> utilities that are becoming cumbersome and largely obsolete in the face >> of accelerating numbers of cores. >> >> One example that comes immediately to mind is 'top'. Here at the house >> my three-years-old server has a pair of dual-core Opterons. Many of >> top's entries appear in groups of four xxxx/0 thru xxxx/3, filling up >> the visible page with repetitive entries. Servers with up to 48 cores >> are going to need a top-ng that sorts processes by core and displays >> them, perhaps, in multiple-tab format with one tab for each core. >> >> Just something to be thinking about... >> >> --Doc Savage >> Fairview Heights, IL >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rhelv5-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list >> > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list > > _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
