XFS is only available as a layer product and therefore not equivalent to ext4.
-Dougal On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > XFS is also an option in 5.5+ and is being released as part of the > 6 Beta. Just a consideration, if size and extents are a factor. > > -- > Bryan J Smith - mailto:[email protected] > http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Adams <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:53:59 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [rhelv5-list] Anybody using ext4? > > I am working on a new server that looks like it is going to go in > service before RHEL 6 is released. I'm building it with plans to > upgrade the OS once RHEL 6 is out and I've tested it (I'm leaving empty > space on the OS drive to install RHEL 6 to a separate partition when I'm > ready). > > I'd like to use ext4 for the data filesystem for extent support and > better allocation patterns. Is anybody using ext4 on RHEL 5 in > production? Any comments, opinions, recommendations, etc.? > -- > Chris Adams <[email protected]> > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list > _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
