While I understand the reluctance for Redhat to commit to any kind of release date I find their refusal to provide information to the community more and more frustrating recently. We all understand that picking a hard date can backfire but there is no reason for Redhat to make the process so murky. They should be keeping customers informed all the way through development with blog postings and other information as to how things are shaping up.
What is the bug count at? How many are serious? Is 2010 still viable? What are their frustrations and what went well? Why has Redhat withdrawn from the public. Now they only seem willing to send me endless emails about big physical events. Can't they find a single person to act as an information source for those of us who can't attend these events? There is no good reason to be so secretive and generally emails like this get responses about talking to your account person. That's backwards, I shouldn't have to chase someone to get information. This is 2010 and Redhat is built on open software and open standards, they should try turning a flashlight on themselves and let the rest of us inside to a far bigger degree. On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Robin Price II <[email protected]> wrote: > Sometime in 2010. > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage > <[email protected]> wrote: > > RHEL6 beta1 and beta2 were released on April 14 and Jun 22, respectively. > > When can we expect to see the RHEL 6 General Availability release? > > > > --Doc Savage > > Fairview Heights, IL > > _______________________________________________ > > rhelv5-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list >
_______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
