I would advise you to read the manpage before asking on a mailing
list...

 

 

       -o output_file

              Write the list of bad blocks to  the  specified  file.
Without

              this option, badblocks displays the list on its standard
output.

              The format of this file is suitable for use by the -l
option  in

              e2fsck(8) or mke2fs(8).

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of vishesh kumar
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:55 AM
To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list
Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] Hard Disk Surface Scan using badblock command

 

Thanks for response
Is there any option to gt the list of damaged blocks.

Thanks



On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:27 PM, John Haxby <[email protected]>
wrote:

 

On 7 February 2011 16:21, Robert G. (Doc) Savage <[email protected]>
wrote:

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 21:37 +0530, vishesh kumar wrote:
> Dear all
>   I suspect one of my hard disk have corruption. I want to perform
> surface scan to get idea of corrupted hard disk sectors. What command
> will be most appropriate for this purpose on RHEL 5.
> Does 'badblocks' is right command to use in this scenario ?

Vinesh,

>From 'man badblocks':

Important  note:  If the output of badblocks is going to be fed to the
e2fsck or mke2fs programs, it is important that the block size is
properly specified, since the block numbers which are generated  are
very  dependent  on the block size in use by the filesystem.  For this
reason, it is strongly recommended that users not run badblocks
directly, but rather use the -c option  of  the e2fsck and mke2fs
programs.

Hope this helps...



That's also somewhat dated now.

You can often recover bad blocks simply by writing to them and letting
the disk allocate replacements -- badblocks -n can be useful for this.

You should also look at smartctl -- it'll tell you whether or not it
thinks the disk is healthy.

Usually when a disk is throwing errors I bin it on the grounds that once
it's started to have problems it's only going to get worse.   Disks are
not generally cheaper than the data they store :-)

jch


_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list




-- 
http://linuxmantra.com

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to