On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, <rhelv5-list-requ...@redhat.com> wrote: > Send rhelv5-list mailing list submissions to > rhelv5-list@redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > rhelv5-list-requ...@redhat.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:07:23 -0400 > From: Marco Shaw <marco.s...@gmail.com> > To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list" > <rhelv5-list@redhat.com> > Subject: [rhelv5-list] NIC bonding > Message-ID: > <cag5nm6rdwhemee+fckuau5jdwp51fa0cijphcpyuamc1spw...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'm possibly looking at testing bonding in a "single network fabric" > environment. > > I was thinking of giving NIC1 IP1, NIC2 IP2, and then creating BOND0 with IP3. > > Is this do-able? All of the IPs are going to be routed through the > same networking device. I'm planning on an active-passive setup, so > when I pull the network cable on NIC1, I'd expect IP3 to be service > from NIC2. > > Marco >
IF you need multiple IP addresses, you can create multiple bonds e.g. bond0, bond1, bond2 out of eth0 and eth1. Not sure if you can do active-active in that scenario though. Cheers, Win _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list rhelv5-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
