On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Collins, Kevin [BEELINE] <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, scripting around the "permission string" of ls -l is not something > I typically do, but that string is pretty much the same on every > platform I have worked on... until now :) > > But I would not be surprised to see this change breaking scripts that > others have.
If the script wants a blank in that location it should already be doing something to account for the possibility that a + is there, so should be easy to modify to ignore the . too. John _______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
